Single-entry lineup review for Week 2

Each week through the NFL season, I’ll review my single-entry DFS lineup, as well as a couple others. I will also track success rates throughout the season. The criteria for the other lineups to make the article (and tracking) will be over 10% of my overall investment. This week, that includes:

• Single-entry lineup
• Afternoon-only lineup

The goal here is to hold myself accountable for the decisions I make while also helping to provide a blueprint for long term success in GPPs. 

Throughout the year, I’ll emphasize the top 10% and top 1% hit rates. While profit/loss is at the mercy of significant variance at the top of tournaments, these hit rates stabilize much faster and can therefore paint a stronger picture of our performance. 

The single-entry

A lot of snowflakes, but were they bad process?

Every choice we make can be categorized in one of four groups:

1. Bad Process, Bad Outcome
2. Bad Process, Good Outcome
3. Good Process, Bad Outcome
4. Good Process, Good Outcome

We’ll begin with No. 1:

Bad process, bad outcome

The Eagles/Niners stack was close to making this category (for reasons I’ll soon discuss), but ultimately I like the stack and the lineup as a whole. This category is N/A this week.

Bad process, good outcome

N/A

Good process, bad outcome

1. Eagles/49ers stack

I had high hopes immediately after Jalen Hurts hit Jalen Reagor for a TD, only to have it called back because Reagor stepped out of bounds before making the catch — little did I know, my day wouldn’t turn around.

Everything that could go wrong after that, did. Hurts connected with Quez Watkins for 91 yards, only for Nick Sirianni to put on a clinic on what not to do with first-and-goal from the 1. The Niners took the lead and bled clock for the entirety of the second half, leading to just four second-half completions by Hurts.

This was the concern — I am a big proponent of the importance of pace in game stacks, and the pace of this game was close to being too fragile to call this stack good process. However, I was after a ceiling outcome, and an Eagles lead would have forced SF to quicken their pace, as well. 

As for George Kittle, I loved our Kyle Murray’s idea from the FTN NFL Live show to pay up at TE. Paying up at TE within a still-cheap stack was therefore extremely enticing. 

Last but not least, DeVonta Smith was top five on the week in air yards, but he hauled in just two receptions. Clearly, he could have had a big week.

2. Chase Claypool

Smith was top five in air yards, but Chase Claypool was No. 2. On the first two drives, Ben Roethlisberger was 0-for-4 on deep targets to Claypool, including a near miss in the endzone. Ugh. I’ll continue to buy low here, believing in Claypool’s chance to breakout into stardom.

Good process, good outcome

1. Austin Ekeler, Ezekiel Elliott

I went from Monday to Sunday morning expecting to run a Chargers/Cowboys passing stack, but the entirety of the stack moved up in ownership, including Mike Williams (5% up to 10%) and Jared Cook (10% to 15%). While these movements might seem insignificant, think of it this way — Dak Prescott and Justin Herbert were projected for around 35% combined ownership. Let’s conservatively say that meant that 25%-30% of all single-entry lineups were going to be LAC/DAL game stacks. Moving from 5% to 10%, in Williams’ case, therefore likely meant that he was moving from around 20% to around 40% within those game stacks. This was the most relevant ownership number to me, since I was originally thinking Williams would be a way to diversify within the stone-chalk game stack.

Austin Ekeler and Ezekiel Elliott provided a massive amount of correlated leverage over all of those passing stacks. Ironically, as bad as my lineup was, I got this fade correct — and Ekeler and Elliott could have had massive games in the exact script that played out. Ekeler had 22-plus DK points despite no scores, and Elliot had 17 despite Tony Pollard rushing for over 100 yards and a score himself. 

2. Bills DST

I won’t often discuss defenses, but this one is worth noting. We had the trifecta here — a poor offensive line, a great defensive line and a high probability of Miami needing to throw the ball a lot. Why were they 1% rostered?

The other lineups

Notes:

I loved my SEA/TEN stack, but this lineup failing to cash shows the difficulty of using such an expensive stack. Since DK Metcalf failed, I simply didn’t have enough firepower remaining to make up for his lackluster performance. This is ultimately what kept me away from this stack on the main slate (although, ironically this exact lineup would have cashed on the main slate). 

This line ran bad a little bit as well, considering Julio Jones’ overturned TD. Honestly, it’s better this way — here’s to hoping all of the run-bad happened at once, and next week my fortunes will turn around. Week 2 was a big disappointment to the bankroll, but I’m actually happier with my process than I was in Week 1, where I comfortably profited. Alas, this is the GPP life.